<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Search BloggersSearch Bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk</link>
	<description>We Are Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!--Theme by MyThemeShop.com-->
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Iain Bartholomew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3020</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Bartholomew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Joel. Like I said to Bill, the important thing is not burning the domain, rather fully considering that option before investing resources in a recovery process.

Of course a new domain doesn&#039;t have to be a wholesale rebrand - adding a hyphen, removing one, adding or removing a geographic term, etc. are all ways to move domain without renaming the business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joel. Like I said to Bill, the important thing is not burning the domain, rather fully considering that option before investing resources in a recovery process.</p>
<p>Of course a new domain doesn&#8217;t have to be a wholesale rebrand &#8211; adding a hyphen, removing one, adding or removing a geographic term, etc. are all ways to move domain without renaming the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tough part is that you can&#039;t just torch domain names for some businesses. It&#039;s a pretty tough sell to go, &quot;Hey, rename your company so that you can have web success again!&quot;

But there are many sites I wish I could do it for; some things just aren&#039;t worth saving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tough part is that you can&#8217;t just torch domain names for some businesses. It&#8217;s a pretty tough sell to go, &#8220;Hey, rename your company so that you can have web success again!&#8221;</p>
<p>But there are many sites I wish I could do it for; some things just aren&#8217;t worth saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Malcolm Gibb</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Gibb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post Iain, I think there are too many agencies and clients alike that simply jump into removal and re-inclusion without looking at the bigger picture of the irreparable damage to the site and the brand. Spending the time and resources that would have been spent removing links building a new domain and doing some proper marketing shit  will no doubt be more beneficial in the end. There is also no guarantee at the end of a link removal project that Google will remove any penalties, the damage is done... sometimes it&#039;s better to just move on and learn from previous mistakes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Iain, I think there are too many agencies and clients alike that simply jump into removal and re-inclusion without looking at the bigger picture of the irreparable damage to the site and the brand. Spending the time and resources that would have been spent removing links building a new domain and doing some proper marketing shit  will no doubt be more beneficial in the end. There is also no guarantee at the end of a link removal project that Google will remove any penalties, the damage is done&#8230; sometimes it&#8217;s better to just move on and learn from previous mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Krystian Szastok</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystian Szastok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to hold my hand up and say &#039;me too&#039;. We&#039;ve decided once on a project that there are too many links that would need to be either removed or disavowed and that what would be left is actually probably 20% of work of removing the crap.
So I totally agree - where possible (client&#039;s sometimes won&#039;t go through with it) I suggest weighting up the work required to clean up a domain versus building a new domain up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to hold my hand up and say &#8216;me too&#8217;. We&#8217;ve decided once on a project that there are too many links that would need to be either removed or disavowed and that what would be left is actually probably 20% of work of removing the crap.<br />
So I totally agree &#8211; where possible (client&#8217;s sometimes won&#8217;t go through with it) I suggest weighting up the work required to clean up a domain versus building a new domain up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Iain Bartholomew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Bartholomew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think my advice is to always burn a penalised site, rather to consider it and make an educated decision before committing resources to a recovery effort.

Thanks for reading Bill, always appreciate your input. A much wiser man than I!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think my advice is to always burn a penalised site, rather to consider it and make an educated decision before committing resources to a recovery effort.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading Bill, always appreciate your input. A much wiser man than I!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Your Website Weigh the Same as a Duck? by Bill Sebald</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/does-your-website-weigh-the-same-as-a-duck-1412/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Sebald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1412#comment-3006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took this advice on one website.  Another I fought for.  Both panned out, but it was a tough call for sure.  Quack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this advice on one website.  Another I fought for.  Both panned out, but it was a tough call for sure.  Quack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A With Nichola Stott &amp; Claire Thompson @ SEO PR Training by SEO PR Training Q&#38;A &#8211; Part 2: Panda Update Survival Tips for Small Business</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/qa-with-nichola-stott-claire-thompson-seo-pr-training-1198/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO PR Training Q&#38;A &#8211; Part 2: Panda Update Survival Tips for Small Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1198#comment-2755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On Monday we asked for your questions to pose to Claire Thompson and Nichola Stott of SEO PR Trainin... The second question is from Hyderali [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Monday we asked for your questions to pose to Claire Thompson and Nichola Stott of SEO PR Trainin&#8230; The second question is from Hyderali [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A With Nichola Stott &amp; Claire Thompson @ SEO PR Training by SEO PR Training Q&#38;A &#8211; Part 1 &#8211; Press Releases for &#8216;Boring Industries&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/qa-with-nichola-stott-claire-thompson-seo-pr-training-1198/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO PR Training Q&#38;A &#8211; Part 1 &#8211; Press Releases for &#8216;Boring Industries&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1198#comment-2754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Yesterday we asked for questions for Nichola and Claire at SEO PR Training &#8211; and Barry Adams sent in a great one. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday we asked for questions for Nichola and Claire at SEO PR Training &#8211; and Barry Adams sent in a great one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We&#8217;re Looking For the UK&#8217;s Number 1 Young SEO by The Young UK SEO of 2011 &#8211; The Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/were-looking-for-the-uks-number-1-young-seo-1285/#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator>The Young UK SEO of 2011 &#8211; The Vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1285#comment-2753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Nominations where made democratically via Twitter and http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/were-looking-for-the-uks-number-1-young-seo-1285/) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Nominations where made democratically via Twitter and <a href="http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/were-looking-for-the-uks-number-1-young-seo-1285/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/were-looking-for-the-uks-number-1-young-seo-1285/</a>) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Young UK SEO of 2011 &#8211; The Vote by And the winner is&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/the-young-uk-seo-of-2011-the-vote-1297/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>And the winner is&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchbloggers.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-2752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week we ran a poll to find out your votes for the Number 1 Young SEO in The UK - and the response was amazing. After around 1000 votes we have found our [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week we ran a poll to find out your votes for the Number 1 Young SEO in The UK - and the response was amazing. After around 1000 votes we have found our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
